-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Hud Render Events #4119
base: 1.21.1
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add Hud Render Events #4119
Conversation
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...1/src/testmodClient/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/test/rendering/client/HudRenderEventsTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Not sure this really goes far enough. The system used by NeoForge has always been pretty ideal (although quite invasive): splitting gui rendering into all the different parts (health, hotbar, status effects, etc.) and allowing mods to render their custom gui layers anywhere in-between. Also it would be awesome to finally get shared height parameters for bars (health bar + armor bar on the left side, food + air on the right side) rendered above the hotbar in Fabric Api. So that multiple mods adding their own bars know at what height to render without interfering with others. |
I agree that Forge's implementation (last when I saw it) is much more versatile and comprehensive. It would be great to be able to cancel certain components too. However as you mentioned it is quite invasive, and in the past, this injection point hasn't exactly been the most stable. A more comprehensive api would need a bit more discussion with the maintainers, but I'd be happy to see it.
The height problem is just reading the code to see the height where bars and components render right? Are you suggesting we provide z constants for different HUD elements? |
No. NeoForge adds |
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Im not sure events like this are the best way to do this. An API that allows you to register LayeredDrawer.Layer's in the desired order may be better?
...endering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/client/rendering/v1/HudRenderEvents.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-rendering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/mixin/client/rendering/InGameHudMixin.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/** | ||
* Called at the start of HUD rendering, right before anything is rendered. | ||
*/ | ||
public static final Event<Start> START = EventFactory.createArrayBacked(Start.class, listeners -> (client, context, tickCounter) -> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are events like this the best solution here? Would it be better to allow mods to register their own LayeredDrawer.Layer in a similar way to how the vanilla hud elements work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have updated the code to use one interface, but I don't see a difference with registration methods. Wouldn't it still be implemented with an event?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking they could just be static? I dont think there is a need for an even unless im missing something.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression that not using events is more complicated than just using events? So there's no need for registration methods? Are you saying just implement it with a synchronized list? Events also allow phase ordering if some mod wants to render before another.
Please let me know if you want to discuss this more |
This please! It would be really great if mods were to properly register their GUI layers with an identifier that allows for ordering with callbacks firing before and after those layers render, as is done on NeoForge. That way other mods can interact with those new layers. Ideally vanilla layers should also be accessible via an identifier, although not sure how to implement that in a way that’s not too invasive. |
I had a discussion with him on discord here, and I think you're misunderstanding his proposal. Under his idea, the API would still have the same capability as the events here, since what you're describing uses many more mixins and is significantly more invasive. I have looked at neo's API, and the number of patches required will probably make it not acceptible for fabric. |
Yes, as discussed on discord I think it would be better to statically register (or maybe register in events similar to the ones in the current state of the PR a vanilla |
Done in 0d2bcf2. |
...-rendering-v1/src/client/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/mixin/client/rendering/InGameHudMixin.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I think what modmuss meant here is that we would have a |
He said it’s fine to register in events. I used events because it allows ordering the layers within one phase/event. Also, directly adding to the vanilla list would require similarly many injection points or rely on the indices which is even more undesirable. |
/** | ||
* Called after the entire HUD is rendered. | ||
*/ | ||
public static final Event<LayeredDrawer.Layer> LAST = createEventForStage(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe END? There is START, not FIRST or smth
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The names are taken from WorldRenderEvents
, which has both LAST
and END
, and LAST
is the last place where you should render stuff in most cases. However, I'm happy to change this if modmuss agrees.
Originally discussed here.
Deprecate
HudRenderCallback
.Fixes #3908.