Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipeshift llama index integration #16610

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sohanpsai
Copy link

Description

This PR integrates Pipeshift API's with llama-index LLMs. This will allows user to use the LLMs depployed on pipeshift with the incredible stuff offered by llama-index. Since Pipeshift api's are open ai compatible, OpenAILike wrapper is used to plant main functionality along with it's test cases.

  • currently keeping contains_example=false under tool.llamahub as the notebook is failing to find pipeshift package, assuming this won't hamper the build. In case it does, please let me know

Dependency: No new dependency

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.

  • I added new unit tests to cover this change
  • I believe this change is already covered by existing unit tests

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 19, 2024
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant