Restructure gitignore

[pedrorrivero]

Summary

Redesign sectioning format and order in .gitignore, and add new ignore (i.e. .venv/).

Details and comments

• Major sections in all-caps
• Subsections use multiple # symbols as in the .md format
• Particular tools are referenced between [...], as in .cfg files

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2184724951

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 2178142706:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	11
Relevant Lines:	11

---

💛 - Coveralls

[garrison]

• Major sections in all-caps

Is there a specific reason you prefer all caps? All caps are generally regarded as more difficult to read.

One thing that's nice about the current organization is that the lineage from GitHub's default python project .gitignore is apparent, and we can compare with the original as it changes over time. That said, the most important thing I care about with regards to this file is that it works for us.

[pedrorrivero]

@garrison

Is there a specific reason you prefer all caps? All caps are generally regarded as more difficult to read.

It is easier to tell sections apart, and distinguish form subsections. After all, we are not reading a whole paragraph in all-caps, but rather just a few words.

One thing that's nice about the current organization is that the lineage from GitHub's default python project .gitignore is apparent, and we can compare with the original as it changes over time.

I was not aware of this, but it might be important overtime. Maybe we should have one section paralleling that file, and labeled accordingly to avoid future confusion; and other sections to add our own ignores. That would work for me as well. Thoughts?