style: editor tab design style

[Ricbet]

Types

• 💄 Style Changes

Background or solution

由于 AI Native 模块的导入顺序比较靠前，在加载 contribution 的时候间接导入了 design 模块的样式文件。
后续等到其他样式文件加载进来的时候优先级高于 design 样式，最终导致样式错乱

Changelog

修复 editor tab 样式错乱问题

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 新功能
  • 更新了应用程序的上下文菜单渲染方式，提升了与其他组件的集成性。

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

此次更改主要涉及对ai-core.contribution.ts文件中AINativeBrowserContribution类的ctxMenuRenderer属性类型的修改。该属性从DesignBrowserCtxMenuService更改为IBrowserCtxMenu，可能会影响应用程序中上下文菜单的渲染方式。其他类声明和导入保持不变，构造函数及方法逻辑未做修改，确保与AI聊天和内联补全相关的核心功能得以保留。

Changes

文件路径	更改摘要
packages/ai-native/src/browser/ai-core.contribution.ts	将AINativeBrowserContribution类中的ctxMenuRenderer属性类型从DesignBrowserCtxMenuService更改为IBrowserCtxMenu。

Possibly related PRs

• chore: improve inline diff indent #3894: 此PR增强了内联差异结果的缩进，可能与主PR中的上下文菜单行为相关，因为两者都涉及处理用户交互和视觉呈现的UI组件。

Suggested labels

💄 style change

Suggested reviewers

• bytemain
• erha19

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcf6ec3 and 7c5e59b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/ai-native/src/browser/ai-core.contribution.ts (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (2)

packages/ai-native/src/browser/ai-core.contribution.ts (2)

139-139: 建议检查其他文件中的潜在影响

虽然这个更改在当前文件中看起来是孤立的，但它可能会影响依赖于 AINativeBrowserContribution 类的其他文件。

建议运行以下脚本来检查可能受影响的其他文件：

#!/bin/bash
# 描述：搜索可能受 AINativeBrowserContribution 更改影响的文件

# 测试：搜索导入 AINativeBrowserContribution 的文件
rg --type typescript "import.*AINativeBrowserContribution" --files-with-matches

# 测试：搜索使用 AINativeBrowserContribution 的文件
rg --type typescript "AINativeBrowserContribution" --files-with-matches

请检查这些文件，确保它们与更新后的 AINativeBrowserContribution 类兼容。

---

139-139: 类型更改看起来是一个改进

将 ctxMenuRenderer 的类型从 DesignBrowserCtxMenuService 更改为 IBrowserCtxMenu 似乎是朝着更通用接口迈进的一步。这可能会提高模块化程度并减少耦合。

请确保 IBrowserCtxMenu 接口包含 visible 属性和 hide 方法，因为这些在 registerEditorFeature 方法中被使用。您可以运行以下脚本来验证：

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[erha19]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.33%. Comparing base (bcf6ec3) to head (7c5e59b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4099      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.34%   54.33%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1594     1594              
  Lines       97404    97404              
  Branches    19926    19926              
==========================================
- Hits        52930    52927       -3     
- Misses      36942    36944       +2     
- Partials     7532     7533       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
jsdom	49.89% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
node	15.62% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Aaaaash]

/next

[opensumi]

🎉 PR Next publish successful!

3.4.5-next-1729069673.0