Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cira #423

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Cira #423

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

rsdmike
Copy link
Member

@rsdmike rsdmike commented Oct 11, 2024

No description provided.

}

password = string(passwordBytes)
fmt.Print(password)

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

Sensitive data returned by an access to password
flows to a logging call.

Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago

To fix the problem, we should avoid printing the password directly. Instead, we can log a message indicating that a password was processed without revealing the actual password. This ensures that sensitive information is not exposed in the logs.

  • Remove the line that prints the password.
  • Add a log statement that indicates a password was processed without revealing the actual password.
Suggested changeset 1
pkg/apf/processor.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/pkg/apf/processor.go b/pkg/apf/processor.go
--- a/pkg/apf/processor.go
+++ b/pkg/apf/processor.go
@@ -237,3 +237,3 @@
 		password = string(passwordBytes)
-		fmt.Print(password)
+		log.Info("Password processed successfully.")
 	} else {
EOF
@@ -237,3 +237,3 @@
password = string(passwordBytes)
fmt.Print(password)
log.Info("Password processed successfully.")
} else {
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants