Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ensure ics27 channels are owned by icahost submodule #432

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johnletey
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@johnletey johnletey self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@johnletey johnletey requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2024 15:14
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on simplifying the upgrade handling process within a Cosmos SDK-based application. Key changes include the removal of the capabilitytypes import and multiple parameters from the RegisterUpgradeHandler method in app.go, the deletion of an end-to-end upgrade test, updates to constants in upgrade/constants.go, and significant alterations to the upgrade logic in upgrade/upgrade.go. These changes collectively streamline the upgrade process by removing legacy components and consolidating functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
app.go - Removed import: capabilitytypes
- Updated method signature for RegisterUpgradeHandler, removing multiple parameters.
e2e/upgrade_test.go - Removed function: TestChainUpgrade, which contained end-to-end tests for the upgrade process.
upgrade/constants.go - Updated constant: UpgradeName changed from "helium" to "v8.1"
- Removed constant: UpgradeASCII.
upgrade/store.go - Updated CreateStoreLoader function by removing storeUpgrades and calling UpgradeStoreLoader with nil.
upgrade/upgrade.go - Removed import statements related to error handling and logging.
- Removed function: MigrateValidatorAccounts.
- Added function: FixICS27ChannelCapabilities.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • boojamya
  • g-luca

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where upgrades bloom,
A rabbit hops, dispelling gloom.
With fewer paths and simpler ways,
We celebrate these brighter days!
No more burdens, just a leap,
In the code, our joy runs deep! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a21212 and a9fcc88.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • e2e/go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
  • e2e/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum, !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • app.go (0 hunks)
  • e2e/upgrade_test.go (0 hunks)
  • upgrade/constants.go (1 hunks)
  • upgrade/store.go (1 hunks)
  • upgrade/upgrade.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • app.go
  • e2e/upgrade_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (7)
upgrade/constants.go (2)

18-18: LGTM! Good move to semantic versioning.

The change from a name-based scheme ("helium") to semantic versioning ("v8.1") improves version clarity and standardization.

Let's verify no references to the old version name remain:

✅ Verification successful

Reference to "helium" is only in documentation, no code changes needed

The only occurrence of "helium" is in a comment documenting historical context of the FixICS27ChannelCapabilities function. Since it's referring to a past event ("was introduced in the v8 Helium upgrade"), this is appropriate documentation and doesn't need to be updated.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old version name
# Expect: No occurrences of "helium" as a version string

rg -i "helium" --type go

Length of output: 122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the "helium" reference to understand if it's just a comment or actual code
rg -i "helium" --type go -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 529


18-18: Verify upgrade handler registration

Since this is a version change, we should ensure the upgrade handler is properly registered with the new version string.

✅ Verification successful

Upgrade handler is properly registered and implemented

The verification shows that:

  1. The upgrade handler is correctly registered in app.go using the UpgradeName constant
  2. The upgrade handler implementation exists in upgrade/upgrade.go
  3. The upgrade name constant is properly referenced in both the handler registration and upgrade plan creation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify upgrade handler registration with new version
# Expect: The new version string should be used in upgrade handler registration

# Look for upgrade handler registration
ast-grep --pattern 'RegisterUpgradeHandler($_, "v8.1", $_)'

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find upgrade handler registration
# First, let's find all files that might contain upgrade handler registration
rg -l "RegisterUpgradeHandler" 

# Then, let's look for any usage of the version constant or string
rg "v8.1|UpgradeName" -A 5 -B 5

# Also search for upgrade handler implementation
rg "func.*Upgrade.*Handler" -A 5

Length of output: 9396

upgrade/store.go (2)

23-23: Clarify relationship with ICS27 channel ownership

Given that the PR objective is to fix ICS27 channel ownership in the icahost submodule, please clarify how removing store upgrades aligns with this goal. Are channel capabilities being managed through a different mechanism now?

Let's check the icahost module integration:

✅ Verification successful

Store upgrade removal is consistent with ICS27 channel ownership fix

The removal of store upgrades is appropriate as the channel ownership fix is being handled through the FixICS27ChannelCapabilities function in upgrade/upgrade.go. This function directly fixes the capability ownership by:

  1. Finding capabilities wrongfully owned by ICA Controller module
  2. Replacing them with ICA Host module ownership
  3. Reinitializing the capability memory store

The store upgrades are not needed because the fix is implemented through the capability keeper's runtime methods rather than requiring store migrations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check icahost module integration and channel capability handling
echo "Checking icahost module references..."
rg -l "icahost"

echo "Checking capability handling in upgrade handlers..."
rg -A 5 "RegisterUpgradeHandler.*icahost"

Length of output: 293


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the files that mention icahost
echo "Checking app.go for icahost references..."
cat app.go

echo -e "\nChecking upgrade/upgrade.go for icahost references..."
cat upgrade/upgrade.go

echo -e "\nChecking legacy.go for icahost references..."
cat legacy.go

# Let's also check for any channel capability related code
echo -e "\nChecking for channel capability patterns..."
rg -A 5 "ChannelCapability|channel.*capability"

Length of output: 18786


23-23: Verify removal of store upgrades

The change to pass nil instead of explicit store upgrades means no store-level upgrades will be performed during height-based upgrades. This is a significant architectural change that needs verification.

Let's check for any store upgrade references or ICS27 channel related code:

upgrade/upgrade.go (3)

24-25: Necessary imports added for capability and ICA types.

The new imports for capabilitytypes, icacontrollertypes, and icahosttypes are required for the updated capability ownership logic.


40-41: Properly invoking capability fix during the upgrade process.

Unwrapping the sdk.Context and calling FixICS27ChannelCapabilities ensures that the capability ownership correction is executed during the upgrade.


47-73: Implementation of FixICS27ChannelCapabilities function is correct.

The function effectively reassigns capabilities owned by the ICA Controller module to the ICA Host module. Iterating from index 1 to index - 1 and updating the capability owners ensures that all relevant capabilities are corrected.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@johnletey johnletey added this to the v8.1.0 milestone Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant