Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bls-aggregation integration test #7

Closed
wants to merge 48 commits into from

Conversation

TomasArrachea
Copy link

@TomasArrachea TomasArrachea commented Aug 19, 2024

Implemented integration tests for BLS-Aggregation crate.
Added 5 tests:

  • 2 quorums 1 operator (ignored)
  • 2 quorums 2 operators shared (ignored)
  • 1 quorum 1 operator
  • 1 quorum 2 operators
  • 2 quorums 2 operators separated

Two cases are ignored as they are failing due to this bug: bls aggregation service doesn't support >1 quorum

@TomasArrachea TomasArrachea marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 21:36
ricomateo and others added 14 commits August 27, 2024 13:17
This PR adds the following changes
* Added 16 unit tests
* Changes to the previous implementation of the BLS aggregation crate in
order to make the tests pass
* Added documentation to the crate

---------

Co-authored-by: supernovahs <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Supernovahs.eth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: tomasarrachea <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pablo Deymonnaz <[email protected]>
This PR sorts all dependencies in alphabetical order

Co-authored-by: supernovahs <[email protected]>
This PR adds unit tests for `AvsRegistryServiceChainCaller` methods

---------

Co-authored-by: tomasarrachea <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pablo Deymonnaz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pablo Deymonnaz <[email protected]>
- Tests in `avs_registry` `writer`
- Refactor and code improvment in `avs_registry`.

---------

Co-authored-by: ricomateo <[email protected]>
This PR contains latest code that is being pulled by incredible squaring
rs repo .

This includes 
- Small nits
- Bug fixes that we come across  while building IS
- other features

goal is to get it reviewed continuously till IS is complete . Then merge
this as well

---------

Co-authored-by: supernovahs <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: tomasarrachea <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pablo Deymonnaz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ricomateo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants