Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remote-source with ssh pattern #156

Conversation

gabriel-farache
Copy link
Contributor

When using ssh (git+ssh://...) remote source, the pattern is wrong when checking if the source directory is remote; it's only matching for https

I fixed the pattern to check if the remote source starts with git+ instead

Copy link

Thanks for making a pull request! 😃
One of the maintainers will review and advise on the next steps.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Dec 22, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (dc14c8d) 14.48% compared to head (3c6ebd8) 14.48%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #156   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   14.48%   14.48%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         214      214           
=======================================
  Hits           31       31           
  Misses        179      179           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@HarikrishnanBalagopal HarikrishnanBalagopal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@HarikrishnanBalagopal HarikrishnanBalagopal merged commit 8779288 into konveyor:main Dec 22, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants