You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want a more opt-in cloud provider transport design.
Describe the Need:
The current train gem is too heavy weight pulling in aws, gce and azure cloud providers I don't use when I only want local docker support. We should be able to just include the train gems we need instead of coupling them in with the main train gem.
And the current train-core gem does not include docker. So there is no way to have a lightweight train-core and docker or aws, azure, gce.
All or nothing approach currently.
Current Alternative
None.
Can We Help You Implement This?:
The new train-docker, train-aws, train-azure, train-gce need to be owned and published by inspec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the Enhancement:
I want a more opt-in cloud provider transport design.
Describe the Need:
The current train gem is too heavy weight pulling in aws, gce and azure cloud providers I don't use when I only want local docker support. We should be able to just include the train gems we need instead of coupling them in with the main train gem.
And the current train-core gem does not include docker. So there is no way to have a lightweight train-core and docker or aws, azure, gce.
All or nothing approach currently.
Current Alternative
None.
Can We Help You Implement This?:
The new train-docker, train-aws, train-azure, train-gce need to be owned and published by inspec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: