-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ros2 fix manager #465
Ros2 fix manager #465
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jakub Delicat <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Delicat <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)husarion_ugv_manager/CMakeLists.txt (4)Line range hint The test setup follows CMake and ROS2 best practices with:
Line range hint The
The addition of Let's verify the header files that will be installed: ✅ Verification successfulInstallation directive correctly added and header files structure verified The
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: List header files that will be installed
# This helps verify the completeness of the installation
fd -e hpp -e h . include/
Length of output: 123 Script: #!/bin/bash
# First, let's check if the include directory exists and its location
fd include
# Then, let's check the content of CMakeLists.txt to understand the context better
cat husarion_ugv_manager/CMakeLists.txt
Length of output: 9966 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the contents of the include directory for this package
ls -R husarion_ugv_manager/include/
Length of output: 721 Line range hint According to the PR description, tests for robot and simulation components are still pending. Please ensure these are addressed in a follow-up PR. Let's check for any TODO comments or placeholders in the test files: Would you like assistance in creating a GitHub issue to track the pending test implementations for robot and simulation components? Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
LGTM |
Description
Requirements
Tests 🧪
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation