-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Persisted Documents: encourage URL approach #305
Draft
benjie
wants to merge
1
commit into
persisted-documents
Choose a base branch
from
persisted-documents-get-url
base: persisted-documents
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we maybe namespace persisted documents under
/graphq/<prefix>/<sha>
?e.g.
/graphql/persisted/<sha>/<operation_name>
/graphql/documents/<sha>/<operation_name>
/graphql/persisted-documents/<sha>/<operation_name>
Main reason for this is that
graphql-sse
already encourages/graphql/stream
, which in theory can conflict with a "custom" hash. Changing this would also leave the options open to add other URL based features later on and not conflict with the persisted documents.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do namespace it in HotChocolate for less collision potential. However, Twitter for instance puts it directly on the GraphQL route as as outlined in this document.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, this is one of the things I was considering changing before moving this out of draft. I think I also want to change it to
/graphql/persisted/<operation_name>/<hash>
so that the op-name comes first for easier debugging. If there's no op-name, we can just use-
for that part of the URL, e.g./graphql/persisted/-/<hash>
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a big fan of having the operation name first. 🤔
From a server perspective, we first look up the hash for the document, and then the operation name within that document. Having the operation name first seems wrong to me.
From a debugging perspective, it does not matter too much whether the operation name comes before the hash.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also if we are looking at Chrome DevTools, the last URL part is displayed. So replacing operation name and hash might even be counter productive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, re Chrome devtools. Okay lets stick with the hierarchical approach, it makes more sense anyway 👍