Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adjustments for charts and code to deploy extension by gardener-operator #1030

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adjustments for charts and code to deploy extension by gardener-operator #1030

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MartinWeindel
Copy link
Member

How to categorize this PR?

/area control-plane
/kind enhancement
/platform azure

What this PR does / why we need it:
To deploy the provider extension into the Garden runtime cluster by gardener-operator with extension class garden, some adjustments are needed in the charts. Missing glue code has been added.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:
Part of gardener/gardener#9635

Release note:

Adjustments for additional deployment of extension and admission controller on Garden runtime cluster by gardener-operator.
The Helm charts for the `application` and `runtime` parts of the gardener-extension-admission-azure admission controller have been separated into standalone charts. These charts now assume a Garden setup with a virtual garden. Both charts must be deployed individually: the `runtime` chart on the Garden runtime cluster, and the `application` chart on the virtual garden. Additionally, the intermediate `global` level in the Helm values has been removed, so you may need to adjust your provided values accordingly.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/control-plane Control plane related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/l Size of pull request is large (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 3, 2024
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 09:35
@MartinWeindel MartinWeindel requested review from a team as code owners December 3, 2024 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/control-plane Control plane related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure size/l Size of pull request is large (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@MartinWeindel @gardener-robot-ci-1 @gardener-robot-ci-2 @gardener-robot