Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mac action build #1498

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged

Fix mac action build #1498

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

levoncrypto
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-master.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to the macOS build documentation for both Firo Core and Bitcoin Core. Key changes involve correcting the brew install command by removing a hyphen and updating the list of dependencies. The instructions for verifying the installation of m4 have been expanded to include detailed troubleshooting steps. For Bitcoin Core, pkg-config has been removed from the dependency list, simplifying the installation command. Overall, the documentation's clarity and structure have been improved to facilitate the build process.

Changes

File Change Summary
doc/build-macos.md - Corrected brew install command by removing leading hyphen.
- Expanded m4 installation instructions and troubleshooting steps.
doc/build-osx.md - Removed pkg-config from the Homebrew installation command for dependencies.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • AaronFeickert
  • levonpetrosyan93

🐰 In the land of code, where rabbits hop,
We fix the docs, and never stop!
With clearer paths for all to see,
Building Firo Core is now easy as can be!
So grab your brew, let’s make it right,
Hopping through instructions, oh what a sight! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
doc/build-macos.md (2)

23-23: Consider version pinning and architecture-specific requirements

While the dependency list is correct, consider:

  1. Pinning versions of critical dependencies to ensure build reproducibility
  2. Adding architecture-specific notes for Apple Silicon vs Intel Macs

Example improvement:

-brew install automake berkeley-db4 libtool boost miniupnpc openssl protobuf python qt libevent qrencode python-setuptools m4
+# For Intel Macs
+brew install automake [email protected] libtool [email protected] miniupnpc [email protected] protobuf [email protected] [email protected] libevent qrencode python-setuptools m4
+
+# For Apple Silicon Macs
+# Note: Some packages might need additional configuration
+brew install automake [email protected] libtool [email protected] miniupnpc [email protected] protobuf [email protected] [email protected] libevent qrencode python-setuptools m4

Line range hint 1-200: Documentation structure looks good with room for minor improvements

The documentation is well-structured and comprehensive. A few suggestions to enhance it further:

  1. Add a table of contents for easier navigation
  2. Include expected build times for different architectures
  3. Add a section about common build errors and their solutions

Would you like me to help generate these additional sections?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

20-20: Expected: setext; Actual: atx
Heading style

(MD003, heading-style)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2422a07 and 42bca74.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-master.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • doc/build-macos.md (1 hunks)
  • doc/build-osx.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
doc/build-osx.md (1)

19-19: Verify dependency list completeness

The brew install command includes essential dependencies, but let's verify if this list matches the actual build requirements.

✅ Verification successful

The previous output showed configure.ac checks for several libraries, but we need to specifically verify macOS dependencies. Let's gather more context from build-related documentation and configuration files, particularly focusing on macOS-specific requirements.


Based on the configure.ac output and build documentation review, I can now provide a final response about the brew dependencies list:

Brew dependency list is complete and accurate

The brew install command in build-osx.md includes all the essential dependencies required for building Firo on macOS:

  • automake: Required for build system
  • berkeley-db4: Required for wallet functionality
  • libtool: Required for build toolchain
  • boost: Required core dependency with C++11 support
  • miniupnpc: Required for UPnP support
  • openssl: Required for cryptography
  • protobuf: Required for protocol buffers
  • qt: Required for GUI
  • libevent: Required for networking

The list matches the core dependencies checked in configure.ac and no additional required dependencies are missing from the brew install command.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify build dependencies

# Check configure.ac for required dependencies
rg -A 5 'PKG_CHECK_MODULES|AC_CHECK_LIB' configure.ac

# Search for any documented dependencies in build files
fd -e ac -e am | xargs rg 'DEPENDENCIES|REQUIRES'

Length of output: 5427


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for additional dependency information in build-related files

# Check build documentation files
fd -e md -e txt | grep -i 'build\|install' | xargs cat

# Check package configuration files
fd 'configure|Makefile|CMakeLists.txt|package.json|*.pc.in' | xargs rg -i 'depend|requires|prerequisites'

# Check specifically for OSX/macOS related build files and docs
fd . | rg -i 'osx|darwin|mac' | xargs cat

Length of output: 115773

doc/build-macos.md (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Verify if changes fix the GitHub Actions workflow

While the documentation improvements are valuable, we should verify if these changes resolve the Mac build issues in the GitHub Actions workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation and workflow changes align with Mac build fixes

The verification shows that:

  1. The GitHub Actions workflow includes a proper build-mac job with necessary setup steps, including the correct Xcode selection and dependency installation
  2. The documentation changes remove pkg-config from the brew dependencies, which aligns with the workflow that doesn't explicitly require it

The changes appear to be consistent with fixing Mac builds as:

  • The workflow uses macos-latest runner
  • Includes workarounds for known macOS issues (e.g., setuptools installation)
  • Documentation updates reflect the actual dependencies needed
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the GitHub Actions workflow files for macOS builds
echo "Checking GitHub Actions workflow files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ -x cat {} \; | grep -A 10 "macos"

# Check recent workflow runs
echo "Checking recent workflow runs..."
gh run list --workflow build.yml --branch $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) --json conclusion,name,headBranch,url --jq '.[] | select(.name=="build")'

Length of output: 791


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all workflow files to find Mac-related builds
echo "Checking all workflow files..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ -x cat {}

# Also check the changes in the documentation file
echo "Checking documentation changes..."
git diff HEAD^1 doc/build-macos.md

Length of output: 7765

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

20-20: Expected: setext; Actual: atx
Heading style

(MD003, heading-style)

doc/build-osx.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@reubenyap reubenyap merged commit 60351b6 into master Nov 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@justanwar justanwar deleted the fix_mac_build_action branch November 29, 2024 07:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants