Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feature：seata benchmark #6580

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: 2.x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feature：seata benchmark #6580

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

wt-better
Copy link
Contributor

@wt-better wt-better commented May 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Building a benchmark for seata. benchmark is divided into three parts from micro to macro:

  • The first part, using jmh for micro-benchmark testing as a performance baseline, applying atomic methods
  • The second part is basic benchmark testing of methods or services, mainly profiler and tracing.
  • The third part, AT, tcc and other transaction modes, business scenario testing

xjlgod
xjlgod reviewed May 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
...mark-baseline/src/main/java/org/apache/seata/benchmark/baseline/BenchmarkChartGenerator.java

public static String readFileContent(File file) throws IOException {
StringBuilder contentBuilder = new StringBuilder();
// 使用当前线程的类加载器获取资源作为流
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use english comment here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, i will fix

xjlgod
xjlgod reviewed May 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
seata-benchmark/seata-benchmark-scenario/src/main/resources/benchmark.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the use of this file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strictly speaking, the scenario is not implemented yet, this is holder, can delete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xjlgod xjlgod xjlgod left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@wt-better @xjlgod