[PR #991/6595d299 backport][stable-3] Doc fix for docker_container image_name_mismatch #997
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![patchback[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/21488?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
* doc-fix-image-name-mismatch * Update description. --------- Co-authored-by: Felix Fontein <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 6595d29)
felixfontein
deleted the
patchback/backports/stable-3/6595d299e2fbcb617e21b5548ad00e0d5198c474/pr-991
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of PR #991 as merged into main (6595d29).
SUMMARY
Make the description of the
image_name_mismatchparameter of thedocker_containermodule more consistent.Contained conflicting statements about the default value, see 2 lines below the changes.
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
docker_container
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Could not find an existing issue for this. Should I raise an issue first, even for this trivial change?