Twig Quality Inspections is an extension to the Twig templating engine which adds static analysis (i.e., compile-time) inspections and runtime assertions to increase templates' quality. See the inspections section below for details.
Unlike other projects like curlylint and djLint, which focus on HTML, this tool exclusively analyzes the Twig code.
The two intended use cases are:
- Add the extension to the
Twig\Environment
during development - Invoke a CLI command in CI and/or pre-commit hook which compiles all templates with the extension enabled.
Note
TwigQI is stable and should work in most codebases due to its simplicity. I would love to hear about your experience using it. Please create an issue or a pull request if you've found an issue. 🙏
Note that TwigQI doesn't support every single edge case, plus it is a little opinionated. You've been warned! 😉 The good news is that you can easily create a bespoke suite by cherry-picking the inspections.
Just in case you need convincing, please consider the following example:
{% macro userCard(user, showBadge = false) %}
{% types {
user: '\\User',
showBadge: 'boolean',
} %}
{{ user.name }}
{% if showBadge %}
{% if usr.admin %} {# Oops #}
(admin)
{% else if user.role %}
({{ user.getRoleLabel(usr.role) }}) {# Uh oh! #}
{% endif %}
{% endif %}
{% endmacro %}
Here, usr.admin
is obviously a typo. Fortunately, this bug is easily detected with strict_types
enabled,
but only if the macro is called with showBadge=true
, which might be uncommon enough to go unnoticed during
development. In this example, the (admin)
badge will simply never be printed in production, where strict_types
is likely disabled. A bug for sure, but perhaps not a critical one.
However, user.getRoleLabel(usr.role)
will cause an uncaught TypeError
if that method's parameter is not nullable,
since Twig will call that method with null
. Instead of just having a buggy badge, the whole page breaks.
First, install using
composer require --dev alisqi/twigqi:dev-main
Next, add the extension to your Twig\Environment
:
$twig->addExtension(new AlisQI\TwigQI\Extension());
Any issues will be reported using PHP's trigger_error
with E_USER_*
levels.
Set up your app and/or CI build to report these as you see fit.
And that's it! 😎
The current design uses NodeVisitor
classes for every inspection. That allows for easy testing and configurability.
The reason the inspections use trigger_error
instead of Exception
s is that the latter would halt compilation,
preventing the extension from reporting multiple issues in one go.
The level of error (error, warning, notice) depends entirely on the authors' opinions on code quality. E_USER_ERROR
is
used for, well, errors, that the author(s) deem actual errors in code. For more opinionated issues (e.g., relying on
macro arguments always being optional), E_USER_WARNING
is used.
Many inspections rely on proper typing. However, the documentation for the types
tag
explicitly avoids specifying the syntax or contents of types.
So how should developers declare types? While PHP developers are often familiar with PHPStan, Twig template designers may instead be used to TypeScript.
The Twig documentation sums up its stance succinctly:
Twig tries to abstract PHP types as much as possible and works with a few basic types[.]
Therefore, TwigQI uses the basic types described by Twig, while defining syntax for iterables. The goal is to have a simple type system that's easy to learn and use, and which should cover the vast majority of use cases.
Your preferences and/or requirements may very well differ.
Here's the list of types supported by TwigQI:
-
Scalar:
string
,number
,boolean
,null
,object
(although a class is preferred) -
Classes, interfaces and traits
Use FQNs with a starting backslash. Note that backslashes must be escaped in Twig strings until v4.
-
Three types of iterables, with increasing specificity
iterable
declares nothing more or less than that the variable is iterableiterable<ValueType>
declares the values' typeiterable<number, ValueType>
anditerable<string, ValueType>
does the same for keys
You can create recursive types:
iterable<string, iterable<number, iterable<string>>>
-
Lastly,
mixed
allows you to declare that a variable is defined without specifying a concrete type.
Any type can be prefixed with ?
to make it nullable.
Note that there's no dedicated syntax for iterables with particular, known keys. Nor can you declare that values have
different types. You could use one of the iterable
variants (e.g., iterable<string, mixed>
), but I would humbly
recommend using a readonly class
to act as a view model.
Here's the list of inspections already considered relevant and feasible.
Those marked with ⌛ are planned / considered, while ✅ means the inspection is implemented.
Note that most of these could also be analyzed by PHPStan if it could properly understand (compiled) templates and how they are rendered. This is the aim of a similar project: TwigStan.
-
✅ Declared types is invalid (e.g.,
{% types {i: 'nit'} %}
) -
✅ Runtime: non-optional variable is not defined
-
✅ Runtime: non-nullable variable is null
-
✅ Runtime: variable does not match type
-
✅ Invalid object property or method (e.g.,
{{ user.nmae }}
)Types for keys and values in
for
loops are automatically derived from iterable types.⚠️ This inspection can trigger false positives, depending on your template logic. -
⌛ Undeclared variable (i.e., missing in
types
,set
, etc)
-
✅ Invalid constant (e.g.,
constant('BAD')
) -
✅ Expressions as first argument (e.g.,
constant('UH' ~ 'OH')
)This is opinionated, as it can work perfectly fine
-
✅ Second argument (object) is not a name (e.g.,
constant('CONST', {})
)This is opinionated, too:
constant('CONST', foo ?: bar)
can work fine
While Twig considers all macro arguments optional (and provides null
as a default), TwigQI considers arguments with
no explicit default value as required.
- ⌛ Arguments not declared using
types
- ✅ Undefined variable used (arguments,
{% set %}
, etc) - ✅ Call with too many arguments (except if
varargs
is used) - ✅ Call with too few arguments
- ✅ Required argument declared after optional
- ✅ Positional argument after named in call expression
- ⌛ Type mismatch in macro call
Big thanks to Ruud Kamphuis for TwigStan, and for helping on this very project.