Refactor timeframes, assets, and flows to use DuckDB for input data

[datejada]

Pull request details

Describe the changes made in this pull request

To use DuckDB instead of tablee

List of related issues or pull requests

Closes #710

Collaboration confirmation

As a contributor I confirm

• I read and followed the instructions in README.dev.md
• The documentation is up to date with the changes introduced in this Pull Request (or NA)
• Tests are passing
• Lint is passing

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (434fd43) to head (1bb9612).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #712   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          768       769    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits           768       769    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

	434fd43...	1bb9612...	434fd43.../1bb96129b41af5...
energy_problem/create_model	0.128 ± 0.0091 h	0.131 ± 0.0074 h	0.982
energy_problem/input_and_constructor	14.9 ± 0.11 s	15.1 ± 0.085 s	0.985
time_to_load	2.92 ± 0.033 s	3.07 ± 0.021 s	0.95

	434fd43...	1bb9612...	434fd43.../1bb96129b41af5...
energy_problem/create_model	0.794 G allocs: 32.9 GB	0.794 G allocs: 32.9 GB	1
energy_problem/input_and_constructor	6.39 M allocs: 0.661 GB	6.41 M allocs: 0.663 GB	0.997
time_to_load	0.153 k allocs: 14.5 kB	0.153 k allocs: 14.5 kB	1

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR.
Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).

[suvayu]

Seems like the default for get_table should be without Val(:raw), and to get a df pass Val(:df).

[datejada]

@suvayu, thanks for the review and suggestion 😄 I think we need to re-evaluate all these changes made during this week, given the results from the benchmarks in the latest PRs. @abelsiqueira has the PR #720 to compare performance. Let's review the big picture in the next meeting and decide how to continue.