Updating the setup script to handle sample data import for Docker #2751
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to several files, primarily focusing on the integration of a new "Venue" entity into the system. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (2)
132-134: Consider adding data validation for venue documentsWhile the implementation follows the existing pattern, consider adding validation before insertion to ensure data integrity.
case "venue": + // Validate venue documents before insertion + const validVenues = docs.filter(doc => + doc.name && typeof doc.name === 'string' && + (!doc.capacity || typeof doc.capacity === 'number') + ); + if (validVenues.length !== docs.length) { + console.warn("\x1b[33m", `Warning: ${docs.length - validVenues.length} invalid venue documents were skipped`); + } - await Venue.insertMany(docs); + await Venue.insertMany(validVenues); break;
179-179: Consider maintaining alphabetical order for collectionsThe venue entry seems arbitrarily placed between posts and appUserProfiles. Consider maintaining alphabetical order for better maintainability.
- { name: "posts", model: Post }, - { name: "venue", model: Venue }, - { name: "appUserProfiles", model: AppUserProfile }, + { name: "appUserProfiles", model: AppUserProfile }, + { name: "posts", model: Post }, + { name: "venue", model: Venue },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
docker-compose.dev.yaml(1 hunks)sample_data/venue.json(1 hunks)src/models/SampleData.ts(2 hunks)src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts(4 hunks)src/utilities/removeSampleOrganizationUtil.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- sample_data/venue.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/utilities/removeSampleOrganizationUtil.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM! Verify Venue model deletion behavior.
The addition of the Venue model follows the existing pattern consistently.
Let's verify the Venue model's integration:
Also applies to: 31-31
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Venue model's integration with sample data and deletion behavior.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Venue model deletion behavior is properly integrated
The Venue model is correctly integrated into the sample data cleanup process:
- It's properly imported and included in the collection models
- The InterfaceSampleData interface includes "Venue" as a valid collection name
- The model follows the standard schema pattern with required organization reference
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Venue model is properly referenced in sample data
ast-grep --pattern 'interface InterfaceSampleData {
$$$
collectionName: $$$"Venue"$$$
}'
# Verify Venue model's schema definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = new Schema({
$$$
})'
Length of output: 22525
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Venue model's usage in removeSampleOrganizationUtil.ts
rg -A 5 "Venue" src/utilities/removeSampleOrganizationUtil.ts
# Check for sample data interface definition
rg -A 10 "interface.*SampleData" src/
# Check for Venue model's usage in sample data
rg "Venue.*collectionName" src/
Length of output: 815
src/models/SampleData.ts (3)
14-14: LGTM! Venue type addition is consistent.
The addition of the Venue type to InterfaceSampleData interface maintains type safety.
32-40: LGTM! Improved enum readability.
The enum values have been reformatted for better readability while maintaining functionality.
Line range hint 1-1: PR changes don't match stated objectives.
The PR description and linked issue (#2270) focus on improving Docker setup script and sample data import functionality. However, the actual changes primarily involve adding the Venue model to the sample data handling system. The Docker-related improvements mentioned in the PR objectives are not reflected in these changes.
Please clarify if:
- This PR is targeting the wrong issue
- Additional changes are pending
- The PR description needs to be updated
Let's check for any Docker setup script changes:
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)
14-14: Verify the Venue model implementation
The import statement looks correct, but let's ensure the Venue model is properly implemented.
✅ Verification successful
The Venue model is properly implemented and exported
The verification confirms:
- The Venue model is correctly exported in
src/models/Venue.ts - The model has a proper schema definition with required fields (name, capacity) and optional fields (description)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Venue model implementation and exports
# Check if Venue model exists and is exported
ast-grep --pattern 'export const Venue = $$$' src/models/*.ts
# Check the model schema
rg -A 10 'const venueSchema = new Schema' src/models/
Length of output: 1874
|
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
|
Reopening as an exception. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
40-46: Fix contradictory hour values across test casesThere are contradicting assertions about volunteer hours:
- In the first test (allTime), user1 has 2 hours
- In the last test (yearly), the same user1 has 8 hours
This indicates either:
- A data consistency issue in the test setup
- Incorrect expectations in the test assertions
Please review and update the test cases to ensure consistent and correct assertions that match the expected behavior of the time-based filtering and sorting.
Also applies to: 89-93
Line range hint
1-93: Add test cases for edge casesWhile the current test suite covers basic functionality, it would benefit from additional test cases for:
- Empty result sets
- Invalid time frames
- Invalid sort orders
- Malformed organization IDs
- Large result sets with pagination
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/resolvers/Query/getVolunteerRanks.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 40-46: Fix inconsistent test assertions in descending order test
The test assertions appear to be logically incorrect for a descending order sort:
- It expects user1 with 2 hours to be ranked Updated Read the docs #1
- Followed by user2 with 8 hours ranked Create installation script #2
- This contradicts the
hours_DESCordering which should place the higher hours (8) before lower hours (2)
Let's verify the helper function's behavior:
|
Please fix the failing tests |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2751 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.74% 97.74%
========================================
Files 358 358
Lines 18114 18115 +1
Branches 2601 2600 -1
========================================
+ Hits 17706 17707 +1
Misses 404 404
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes I fixed the failing test and this test is failing due to changes i made in |
|
Does this work with any combination of docker and non docker implementations for Talawa API and Talawa Admin? |
@palisadoes The system is being designed to support any combination of Dockerized and non-Dockerized setups for Talawa API and Talawa Admin. If both are Dockerized, a shared network is required for communication. While contributors can set this up manually, I’m working on automating the process for a smoother experience. The design also handles mixed environments (Dockerized and non-Dockerized) by ensuring proper connections and configurations, making the setup seamless for all contributors. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
setup.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
setup.ts
[error] 977-978: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
setup.ts (1)
469-521: Function runDockerComposeWithLogs implemented correctly
The function effectively checks for the Docker daemon status and manages Docker Compose operations with appropriate timeout handling.
|
Is this ready to be merged? |
|
Yes @palisadoes |
palisadoes
merged commit 67c805e
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix, feature
Issue Number:
Fixes #2270
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
This PR addresses the following issues:
These changes improve the developer experience by simplifying the environment setup and ensuring seamless container interactions.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
None
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores