Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0] Migration of module purchase_stock_operating_unit #615

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alan196
Copy link
Contributor

@alan196 alan196 commented Jul 27, 2023

This PR depends on #595

@alan196 alan196 mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2023
10 tasks
@alan196 alan196 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-purchase_stock_operating_unit branch from 3218e33 to 446568c Compare August 24, 2023 15:04
@alan196 alan196 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-purchase_stock_operating_unit branch from 446568c to 3d4c757 Compare September 6, 2023 17:05
@max3903 max3903 added this to the 16.0 milestone Sep 7, 2023
@max3903
Copy link
Member

max3903 commented Sep 7, 2023

/ocabot migration purchase_stock_operating_unit

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2024

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Jan 7, 2024
@AaronHForgeFlow AaronHForgeFlow added no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. and removed stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. labels Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
migration needs review no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants