cargo-hakari: 0.9.30 -> 0.9.33

[nartsisss]

• Update package to 0.9.33 (diff)
• Remove with lib; in meta

Should this package be moved to pkgs/by-name?

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4650

[nartsisss]

@macalinao are you still maintaining this package? Can't choose you as a reviewer (bot too)

[pbsds]

that means they have not accepted the invite email.

[pbsds]

you're welcome to add yourself as a maintainer, and may then merge r-ryantm PRs if you do migrate to by-name. If you're not interested i can merge

[nartsisss]

@pbsds Done. Thanks!

Should I squash commits or is that ok?

[pbsbot]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 346942

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• cargo-hakari