Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(priceprovider-bybit): add special exception for blocked regions in bybit test #55

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

Unique-Divine
Copy link
Member

@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved error handling for geographical access restrictions in the price update process.
    • Added a specific error message for users facing access issues based on their location.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced testing mechanisms to ensure proper handling of access-related errors during price updates.

@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 03:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the bybit.go and bybit_test.go files within the feeder/priceprovider/sources package. A new error constant, ErrBybitBlockAccess, has been introduced to enhance error handling for geographical access restrictions. The BybitPriceUpdate function has been modified to return this error when applicable. Additionally, the test function TestBybitPriceUpdate has been updated to include checks for this new error condition, improving the robustness of the test.

Changes

File Change Summary
feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit.go Added constant ErrBybitBlockAccess for geographical access errors; modified BybitPriceUpdate to handle this error. Renamed variable b to respBody.
feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit_test.go Updated TestBybitPriceUpdate to check for ErrBybitBlockAccess in error handling.

Possibly related issues

Poem

🐇 In the land of bytes and code,
A rabbit hops, a new path showed.
With errors caught and tests refined,
Bybit's secrets now aligned.
So let us cheer, for clarity's gain,
In the world of prices, we shall reign! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit.go (2)

32-33: LGTM: New constant added for improved error handling.

The ErrBybitBlockAccess constant is well-defined and follows Go naming conventions. It will be useful for identifying specific error conditions related to geographical access restrictions.

Consider adding a brief comment above the constant to explain its purpose, for example:

// ErrBybitBlockAccess is the error message returned when access is blocked due to geographical restrictions.
const ErrBybitBlockAccess = "configured to block access from your country"

47-47: LGTM: Improved variable naming and error handling.

The changes enhance the readability and error handling capabilities of the BybitPriceUpdate function:

  1. Renaming b to respBody improves code clarity.
  2. The new error handling logic for blocked access provides more context when this specific error occurs.

Consider using a custom error type instead of wrapping the error with a string. This would allow for more structured error handling:

type BybitBlockedAccessError struct {
    Err error
}

func (e *BybitBlockedAccessError) Error() string {
    return fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v", ErrBybitBlockAccess, e.Err)
}

// In the BybitPriceUpdate function:
if strings.Contains(string(respBody), ErrBybitBlockAccess) {
    return nil, &BybitBlockedAccessError{Err: err}
}

This approach would make it easier for callers to check for this specific error type if needed.

Also applies to: 55-59

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f1804f and 74dfe89.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit.go (3 hunks)
  • feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit_test.go (1)

16-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling and test coverage

The addition of error handling for ErrBybitBlockAccess is a good improvement. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The ErrBybitBlockAccess constant is not defined in this file. Consider adding a comment to explain its origin or import it explicitly for clarity.

  2. The current implementation might mask other potential errors. Consider logging the error or asserting that it's specifically ErrBybitBlockAccess rather than just containing the error message.

  3. The test might benefit from additional cases to cover other potential error scenarios.

Consider refactoring the error handling as follows:

 if err != nil {
-    require.ErrorContains(t, err, ErrBybitBlockAccess)
-    return
+    if errors.Is(err, ErrBybitBlockAccess) {
+        t.Log("Bybit access blocked, skipping further assertions")
+        return
+    }
+    t.Fatalf("Unexpected error: %v", err)
 }

This change will:

  • Use errors.Is for more precise error checking
  • Log a message explaining why further assertions are skipped
  • Fail the test for unexpected errors, improving test coverage

To ensure ErrBybitBlockAccess is properly defined, run:

Would you like assistance in adding more test cases to cover other error scenarios?

feeder/priceprovider/sources/bybit.go (2)

5-5: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriately.

The addition of the "fmt" and "strings" packages is consistent with the new error handling logic introduced in this change.

Also applies to: 9-9


Line range hint 1-85: Summary: Improved error handling for blocked regions in Bybit.

The changes in this file effectively address the PR objective of adding a special exception for blocked regions in Bybit tests. Key improvements include:

  1. Addition of a new constant ErrBybitBlockAccess for clear error messaging.
  2. Enhanced error handling in the BybitPriceUpdate function to detect and report geographical access restrictions.
  3. Improved variable naming for better code readability.

These changes will make it easier to identify and handle cases where Bybit blocks access based on geographical location, improving the robustness of the price provider implementation.

@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine merged commit 2bb5f3e into main Oct 9, 2024
2 checks passed
@Unique-Divine Unique-Divine deleted the ud/fix-test branch October 9, 2024 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[tests] Make unit-tests workflow more consistent with improved Bybit price provider
1 participant