-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 560
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add EmuNAND support for TWL_FIRM, other related fixes #1696
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
arm9/source/emunand.c
Outdated
@@ -77,15 +77,15 @@ void locateEmuNand(FirmwareSource *nandType) | |||
if(!sdmmc_sdcard_readsectors(nandOffset + 1, 1, temp) && memcmp(temp + 0x100, "NCSD", 4) == 0) | |||
{ | |||
emuOffset = nandOffset + 1; | |||
emuHeader = nandOffset + 1; | |||
emuHeader = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've cherry-picked 56e44a6, could you please rebase?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
.section .large_patch.emunand, "aw", %progbits | |||
.arm | |||
.thumb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you explain the rationale behind this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mentioned this in the commit message for 6ffef91 but I guess I should've explained more prominently: the free space region in kernel9 used for the emunand patch is too small in the TWL_FIRM kernel9s from firmware versions 3.0 and 3.1 to fit the old patch, so I ported the patch to thumb mode to make it fit.
I don't remember exactly how small the free space is in those versions or by how much the old arm-mode patch didn't fit, but I remember trying to cut down the size of the patch while keeping it in arm mode, and I was almost able to get it small enough, but I had to resort to some pretty ugly-looking hacks at that point, and it was still 4 or 8 bytes to big. I didn't see a strong reason to not just use thumb, so I just used thumb.
If you'd like me to go find the exact numbers for all this I can do so, it'll just take a little while for me to find it.
- port the emunand patch to thumb and remove unnecessary register restores so it fits in the kernel9 free space of 3.x TWL_FIRMs - account for possibly unaligned code in patchNandRw
Although I understand that retail DSiWare will still load their data off their NAND due to the lack of patches, will your commit (de7d576) allow us to install homebrew that do not rely on NAND (nds_hb_menu) only on EmuNAND, or would they also need a SysNAND installation as well (as per current requirements)? |
33fbfb3
to
35a7ca2
Compare
This pull request fixes reading sector 0 of most EmuNAND configurations (I wrote about that in more detail in #1687), fixes a minor bug in the exception display code, fixes loading certain old TWL_FIRM versions as external firms, adds support for handling arm9 exceptions in TWL_FIRM (mainly just useful for debugging other patches), and adds support for patching TWL_FIRM Process9 to use EmuNAND.
EmuNAND and exception support was tested on the Old3DS TWL_FIRM versions introduced in 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, 4.4, 4.5, 6.0, 6.2, and 11.8 and on the New3DS TWL_FIRM versions introduced in 8.1 and 11.8 (thanks to @ItsPizzaTime1501 for help with some of that). I'm pretty sure that covers all TWL_FIRM versions since 3.0, but let me know if I missed one. Here's a build of commit e5fb94d for anyone who'd like to do additional testing or just use these features.
It should be noted that this only affects NAND interaction done by TWL_FIRM's Process9. Once control has been handed off to devLauncher and the launched TWL app, SysNAND will be used as usual. To have TWL mode fully functional without any reliance on SysNAND, which was my original goal, NAND redirection patches for devLauncher would be required in conjunction with the changes in this PR. I intend to eventually try to create such patches, but for now I think the closest thing that exists is this.