-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix deprecations #325
Fix deprecations #325
Conversation
Not a fault of the bot, but the comment above that explicitly says that |
JuliaPlots/RecipesBase.jl#22 |
There hasn't been a tag of RecipesBase that includes the change though. When that happens we can make the Though that brings me to a general gripe of mine with this package: It shouldn't depend on a piece of one particular plotting stack. It would be better to separate the plotting of time series out of this package, though I'm not sure how best to do that. That's an aside though. |
I'm waiting it for being widely tested.
IMO, I prefer a single, versatile repo. Line 2 in 377985e
|
My problem with depending on a particular piece of one plotting stack is that it makes it easy to plot with that stack but not with others. As an example, RecipesBase is exclusive to Plots.jl and its ecosystem, but I plot almost exclusively in Gadfly. I don't doubt that RecipesBase is stable, it seems unfair for a more general package to be opinionated about how you should plot things. But maybe that's just me. |
I'm sorry for letting you feel uncomfortable about Plots.jl only in current state. What I want is managing to embrace more ecosystems if possible! And I want all of them are gathered in the same repo instead of spilling features into lots of repos; we can do well integration testing/upgrading. |
Optional dependencies are definitely the way to go here (and elsewhere), the problem is that there's no direct support for them in Julia yet. 🙁 |
I fixed a number of deprecations for you