Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: OSFClient v0.1.0 #112468

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 33e8536-2a07-4fc3-9dee-be02cadd29f2
Repo: https://github.com/s-ccs/OSFClient.jl.git
Tree: bf0b1c0330b3e62d79a6c4f7b2dcf940eaf3c8c0

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed.

3. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@aplavin
Copy link
Contributor

aplavin commented Aug 6, 2024

I wonder if any of the functionality is missing in https://github.com/JuliaAPlavin/OpenScienceFramework.jl that's been available and stable for several years already? Should be quite fully featured, including upload support.

Not that I'm completely against creating another package if its goals are fundamentally incompatible, but would be nice to mention relevant difference in the README if that's the case.

@behinger
Copy link

behinger commented Aug 6, 2024

Oh no... I searched multiple times for osf API, but nothing showed up....This is a very valid concern. And I'll stop the registration for now and rather PR if at all necessary.

How did I miss this...

It will take some time for me to crosscheck though

@aplavin
Copy link
Contributor

aplavin commented Aug 7, 2024

Looking forwards for suggestions and PRs to OpenScienceFramework.jl! Including anything that would make it more discoverable in search...

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2024

This pull request has been inactive for 30 days and will be automatically closed 7 days from now. If this pull request should not be closed, please either (1) fix the AutoMerge issues and re-trigger Registrator, which will automatically update the pull request, or (2) post a comment explaining why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. [noblock]

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Sep 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been inactive for more than 30 days and has automatically been closed. Feel free to register your package or version again once you fix the AutoMerge issues. [noblock]

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the registrator-osfclient-33e85369-v0.1.0-93b3edd0c5 branch September 13, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants