-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New package: OSFClient v0.1.0 #112468
New package: OSFClient v0.1.0 #112468
Conversation
JuliaRegistrator
commented
Aug 6, 2024
- Registering package: OSFClient
- Repository: https://github.com/s-ccs/OSFClient.jl
- Created by: @behinger
- Version: v0.1.0
- Commit: d334d1e94970d17820277d48d8a240ce2a10e340
- Reviewed by: @behinger
- Reference: registry issue s-ccs/OSFClient.jl#6 (comment)
UUID: 33e8536-2a07-4fc3-9dee-be02cadd29f2 Repo: https://github.com/s-ccs/OSFClient.jl.git Tree: bf0b1c0330b3e62d79a6c4f7b2dcf940eaf3c8c0 Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human. 1. New package registrationPlease make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines. 2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed. 3. To pause or stop registrationIf you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add |
I wonder if any of the functionality is missing in https://github.com/JuliaAPlavin/OpenScienceFramework.jl that's been available and stable for several years already? Should be quite fully featured, including upload support. Not that I'm completely against creating another package if its goals are fundamentally incompatible, but would be nice to mention relevant difference in the README if that's the case. |
Oh no... I searched multiple times for osf API, but nothing showed up....This is a very valid concern. And I'll stop the registration for now and rather PR if at all necessary. How did I miss this... It will take some time for me to crosscheck though |
Looking forwards for suggestions and PRs to OpenScienceFramework.jl! Including anything that would make it more discoverable in search... |
This pull request has been inactive for 30 days and will be automatically closed 7 days from now. If this pull request should not be closed, please either (1) fix the AutoMerge issues and re-trigger Registrator, which will automatically update the pull request, or (2) post a comment explaining why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. [noblock] |
This pull request has been inactive for more than 30 days and has automatically been closed. Feel free to register your package or version again once you fix the AutoMerge issues. [noblock] |