Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommend juliaup #1969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2023
Merged

Recommend juliaup #1969

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2023

Conversation

IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

@IanButterworth IanButterworth commented Nov 20, 2023

For when it is time to recommend juliaup over the downloads table.

Copy link

Once the build has completed, you can preview your PR at this URL: https://julialang.netlify.app/previews/PR1969/ in ~15 minutes

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member

See also: https://github.com/JuliaLang/juliaup/milestone/7

Copy link
Member

@LilithHafner LilithHafner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Juliaup is not fully mature and there are unresolved issues on the release blocker milestone. But if a friend asked me how to install Julia, I would tell them to use juliaup because, despite its imperfections, it is already significantly better than the alternatives. Consequently, I want to merge this PR.

downloads/index.md Show resolved Hide resolved
downloads/index.md Show resolved Hide resolved
downloads/index.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@LilithHafner LilithHafner marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 18:58
@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member

See also: #1922

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member Author

@davidanthoff whats your current perspective on when juliaup is ready to get recommended like this?

I'm just thinking about the 1.10 release coming up

@IanButterworth IanButterworth force-pushed the ib/promote_juliaup branch 2 times, most recently from dd7b1be to c6fa000 Compare December 30, 2023 03:27
@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member Author

I think it's fair to summarize that julia devs feel that juliaup has basically already become the recommended method, so whilst there's some issues left to resolve, it seems to work well and it would be natural for it to be recommended here, so let's go ahead.

@IanButterworth IanButterworth merged commit b7154eb into main Dec 31, 2023
2 checks passed
@IanButterworth IanButterworth deleted the ib/promote_juliaup branch December 31, 2023 06:07
@davidanthoff
Copy link
Contributor

Fair enough :) I think in terms of things that really don't work right now, the only thing I can think of is depots on network file systems, i.e. clusters. Juliaup uses file system locks, and they don't work on network file systems, so that scenario just doesn't work.

I had a very busy semester and didn't have time for much Julia stuff at all, but I'm not teaching in the spring, so hopefully should have much more time to finish up the remaining open issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants