mkdocs-material 9.5.41 (new formula)

[clintonsteiner]

• [ x ] Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• [ x ] Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• [ x ] Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• [ x ] Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• [ x ] Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• [ x ] Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[github-actions]

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

[gromgit]

Is this a Material Design library for mkdocs? If so, this should probably depends_on "mkdocs", and have a test similar to the one in mkdocs.

If it's a drop-in replacement for mkdocs (as the docs seem to suggest), then again, a similar test to mkdocs seems warranted, and a conflicts_with clause should probably be added.

[clintonsteiner]

This is a design library for mkdocs @gromgit

[clintonsteiner]

Changed to take pr comments, thanks @gromgit