sequoia-sq 0.38.0 (new formula)

[rrotter]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

~ % brew audit --new sequoia-sq
sequoia-sq
  * GitLab repository not notable enough (<30 forks and <75 stars)
Error: 1 problem in 1 formula detected.

https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-sq does not have very many stars, but I'd ask that you consider:

1. It's the main CLI for its library/parent project, https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia, which has just under 400 stars
2. It's in Debian, Arch, and Fedora: https://repology.org/project/sequoia-sq/badges

[rrotter]

Okay, there's clearly some issues to work out here. I'll try this in a Linux vm tomorrow evening. TBH I wrote this a while ago and really thought I'd tested on Linux too, but apparently I didn't. (Works fine on macOS, I wouldn't have sent the pr otherwise)

[chenrui333]

Sounds good, thanks @rrotter!

[rrotter]

Okay, I've fixed the build failures (and made brew linkage happy afaict). Now the only error I'm getting is the brew audit --new notability failure. Can you consider an exception considering the mitigating factors I listed above?