Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite SW query to use blink_features #196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Rewrite SW query to use blink_features #196

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

tunetheweb
Copy link
Member

Blink features will no longer be available in pages table and this should be looking at the cheaper table anyway.

@tunetheweb tunetheweb merged commit 95b9931 into master Jun 20, 2024
1 check passed
@tunetheweb tunetheweb deleted the sw-sql-rewrite branch June 20, 2024 11:14
FROM
`httparchive.pages.*`
`httparchive.blink_features.usage`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this table updated by the time the reports are generated? Or is it expected to lag by a month?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like all the other blink features queries this one will be delayed. But not by a month, as we rerun the reports on the 2nd of the month specifically because this data is available then.

Eventually we'll rewrite these all to use the all tables at which point this will no longer be an issue but until then I don't see why this SW query needs to be treated differently.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just asking what the expected behavior is. Sounds like the lag is WAI, and you're right that it's less than a month.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants