Bump jupyter/scipy-notebook from ubuntu-22.04 to ubuntu-24.04 #6859
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![dependabot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/29110?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Bumps jupyter/scipy-notebook from ubuntu-22.04 to ubuntu-24.04. --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: jupyter/scipy-notebook dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
dependabot
bot
added
dependencies
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the Docker image for the
jupyter/scipy-notebookfromubuntu-22.04toubuntu-24.04. The change aims to enhance security and stability by using the latest base image. - Key components modified: The
examples.Dockerfileis modified to update the base image. - Impact assessment: The change impacts the Docker build process and the environment in which the examples run.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The new base image might introduce new dependencies or deprecate old ones, affecting compatibility.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The update changes the base Docker image used for building the container.
- Component interactions: There are no direct interaction changes, but the underlying system libraries and dependencies might be updated, impacting the overall environment.
- Integration points: The change impacts the Docker build process and the environment in which the examples run.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
File Path: examples.Dockerfile
Function/Class Name: N/A (Dockerfile directive)
- Submitted PR Code:
--- +++ @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ # This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public # License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this # file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. # # Worked examples docker container # Provides all worked examples from the FlowKit docs in a ready-to-go JupyterLab install # -FROM quay.io/jupyter/scipy-notebook:ubuntu-22.04@sha256:a8925f5242a701edd718a4c1afc3bdeabb7dcb9ae6ff55116db790379a6f6e04 +FROM quay.io/jupyter/scipy-notebook:ubuntu-24.04@sha256:819156f6dff93998251d0f577ef49b0bafa7f948001979f1246193f1871daf97 RUN rm -rf /home/$NB_USER/work ARG SOURCE_VERSION=0+unknown ENV SOURCE_VERSION=${SOURCE_VERSION} ENV SOURCE_TREE=FlowKit-${SOURCE_VERSION} COPY --chown=${NB_UID}:${NB_GID} docs/source/analyst/worked_examples/*.ipynb /home/$NB_USER/ COPY --chown=${NB_UID}:${NB_GID} docs/source/analyst/advanced_usage/worked_examples/*.ipynb /home/$NB_USER/ COPY flowmachine /${SOURCE_TREE}/flowmachine COPY flowclient /${SOURCE_TREE}/flowclient USER root
- Analysis:
- The change updates the base image from
ubuntu-22.04toubuntu-24.04. - This can introduce new system libraries and potentially deprecate old ones, affecting the compatibility of the examples.
- The
sha256hash ensures that the specific version of the image is being used, which is good for reproducibility.
- The change updates the base image from
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
# Add a comment explaining the reason for the change # Updated to ubuntu-24.04 for improved security and stability FROM quay.io/jupyter/scipy-notebook:ubuntu-24.04@sha256:819156f6dff93998251d0f577ef49b0bafa7f948001979f1246193f1871daf97
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures the use of the latest and potentially more secure base image.
- Business value: Improved security and stability for the examples environment.
- Risk assessment: There is a risk of incompatibility with the new base image, which needs to be mitigated through thorough testing.
Cross-cutting Concerns (if applicable)
- Data flow analysis: The data flow remains unchanged, but the new base image might affect the overall environment.
- State management implications: No direct state management implications, but the new base image might introduce new system libraries or deprecate old ones.
- Error propagation paths: The change does not introduce new error propagation paths, but thorough testing is crucial to catch any incompatibilities.
- Edge case handling across components: Ensure that edge cases related to the new base image, such as dependency compatibility, are validated through testing.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis (if applicable)
- Complexity analysis: The change does not introduce new algorithms or data structures.
- Performance implications: The performance impact is minimal as the change only updates the base image.
- Memory usage considerations: The new base image might include performance improvements or optimizations, which could affect memory usage.
2.2 Implementation Quality (if applicable)
- Code organization and structure: The Dockerfile is well-structured and follows best practices by using ARG and ENV for versioning.
- Design patterns usage: The use of specific SHA hashes for the base image ensures reproducibility.
- Error handling approach: There are no specific error handling mechanisms in the Dockerfile, but the overall structure and commands are straightforward and unlikely to cause errors.
- Resource management: The change does not introduce significant resource management concerns, but thorough testing is crucial to ensure compatibility.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues:
- Issue description: Potential incompatibility with the new base image.
- Impact:
- Technical implications: The examples might not run correctly if there are compatibility issues with the new libraries or dependencies.
- Business consequences: Users might experience errors or unexpected behavior when running the examples.
- User experience effects: Decreased reliability and trust in the examples provided.
- Recommendation:
- Specific code changes: None needed for the Dockerfile itself.
- Configuration updates: Ensure all dependencies and libraries used in the examples are compatible with the new base image.
- Testing requirements: Thoroughly test the examples in the new environment to catch any incompatibilities early.
-
🟡 Warnings:
- Warning description: Lack of documentation for the change.
- Potential risks:
- Performance implications: None.
- Maintenance overhead: Developers might not be aware of the changes and their implications.
- Future scalability: Proper documentation helps in future maintenance and scalability.
- Suggested improvements:
- Implementation approach: Add a comment in the Dockerfile explaining the reason for the change.
- Migration strategy: Update the project documentation to reflect the change.
- Testing considerations: Ensure the documentation is accurate and up-to-date.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The Dockerfile is straightforward and well-structured, but proper documentation is crucial for future maintenance.
- Readability issues: The Dockerfile is readable, but adding comments to explain the reason for the change can improve readability.
- Performance bottlenecks: The performance impact is minimal, but thorough testing is crucial to catch any incompatibilities.
4. Security Assessment (if applicable)
4.1 Security Considerations
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: The change does not directly affect authentication or authorization.
- Data handling concerns: Ensure that the new base image does not introduce new vulnerabilities.
- Input validation: Validate the inputs and dependencies used in the examples to ensure they are compatible with the new base image.
- Security best practices: The new base image might include security patches and updates, enhancing the overall security.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
- Potential security risks: Ensure that the new base image does not introduce new vulnerabilities.
- Mitigation strategies: Thoroughly test the examples in the new environment to catch any security issues early.
- Security testing requirements: Conduct security testing to validate the security of the new base image.
5. Testing Strategy (if applicable)
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Ensure all examples run correctly in the new environment.
- Integration test requirements: Test the integration of the examples with other components in the new environment.
- Edge cases coverage: Validate edge cases related to the new base image, such as dependency compatibility.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
# Example test case for validating the compatibility of the examples
def test_example_compatibility():
# Test code to validate the compatibility of the examples in the new environment
pass- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the test coverage includes all examples and edge cases.
- Performance testing needs: Benchmark the performance of the examples in the new environment to identify any improvements or regressions.
6. Documentation & Maintenance (if applicable)
- Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration): Update the project documentation to reflect the change to the base image.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: Proper documentation helps in future maintenance and scalability.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Ensure that the monitoring and debugging capabilities are in place to catch any issues early.
7. Deployment & Operations (if applicable)
- Deployment impact and strategy: The change impacts the Docker build process and the environment in which the examples run.
- Key operational considerations: Ensure that the deployment process is smooth and that any issues are caught early through testing.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- Conduct thorough testing of the examples in the new base image to catch any incompatibilities.
-
Important improvements suggested:
- Add a comment in the Dockerfile explaining the reason for the change.
- Update the project documentation to reflect the change.
-
Best practices to implement:
- Ensure all dependencies and libraries used in the examples are compatible with the new base image.
- Validate the inputs and dependencies used in the examples to ensure they are compatible with the new base image.
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Validate edge cases related to the new base image, such as dependency compatibility.
- Conduct security testing to validate the security of the new base image.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continuously update the base image to ensure security and stability.
- Business capability evolution: Improved security and stability for the examples environment.
- System integration impacts: Ensure compatibility with the new base image through thorough testing.
FlowAuth
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
FlowAuth
|
| Branch Review |
dependabot-docker-jupyter-scipy-notebook-ubuntu-24.04
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 03m 36s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | dependabot[bot] |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
1
|
Flaky
|
2
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
2
|
Passing
|
40
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Tests for review
cypress/e2e/two_factor_auth.js • 1 failed test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Two-factor setup > Two factor setup flow. |
Test Replay
Screenshots
|
|
add_new_server.js • 1 flaky test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| Server management > Add duplicate Server name |
Test Replay
Screenshots
|
|
user_details_spec.js • 1 flaky test
| Test | Artifacts | |
|---|---|---|
| User details screen > Change user password |
Test Replay
Screenshots
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps jupyter/scipy-notebook from ubuntu-22.04 to ubuntu-24.04.
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)