-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
Coding Style
Our best-practices and guidelines include:
- Hardened JS
- Control Flow
-
Errors
- Note: pending resolution of #5672, within agoric-sdk, let's use the SES global
assert
rather than importing from@agoric/assert
.
That is: useconst { details: X, quote: q, Fail } from assert;
. - Prefer
assert.error(...)
toError(...)
. PreferError(...)
tonew Error(...)
. - Prefer
- Note: pending resolution of #5672, within agoric-sdk, let's use the SES global
cond || Fail`complaint`;
over
assert(cond, X`complaint`);
- Interfaces, Shapes, and Guards
- Limit work by message size
- Linting:
yarn lint
with our flavor of Airbnb JavaScript Style - Prepare-Commit pattern in smart contracts
- Types documentation
- Change Logs and Release Notes
Each package may use one of two styles:-
CHANGELOG.md
is auto-generated from Conventional commits -
NEWS.md
is manual
-
-
Unit Testing:
yarn test
- Version control with git
- commit messages: Conventional Commits
- Tidy Commit History
See also: issues labelled code-style.
Try to write code that makes clear what it does without comments. Of course comments often make the code more clear or give helpful context about history and patterns.
We use JSDoc with Typescript extensions so that the types written in comments are checked statically.
We also have several codes for kinds of comments,
-
TODO
notes something to come back and do. It's best to file an issue and link it so we can track it getting done. -
FIXME
notes something that is broken that needs fixing. -
XXX
acknowledges some tech debt. It's not broken and doesn't need to be tracked as something to change, but it should not be emulated. -
UNTIL
specifies a blocking issue. -
HACK
acknowledges it's not pretty but doesn't recommend changing it.
Using issue links helps us to keep the comments in sync with issue tracking. Whereas a link in TODO or FIXME is for making a change at the comment site, UNTIL means indicates what issue is blocking an improvement.
where to put this? under eslint, vs-code, or other?
symptoms:
[Error - 11:42:15 AM] ESLint stack trace:
[Error - 11:42:15 AM] Error: Failed to load config "@endo" to extend from.
treatment: restart the eslint plug-in:
- Command palette (Ctrl + P), "Developer: reload window", or
- quit and restart vs-code
background: #3355
Agoric SDK and most dapps use Node.js modules (NESM). Some dapps still use an emulator we have deprecated and call RESM (because of the node -r esm
invocation).
To migrate from RESM to NESM, a package must use the Agoric fork of esm
, like "esm": "agoric-labs/esm#Agoric-built"
or "resolutions": {"**/esm": "agoric-labs/esm#Agoric-built"}
to be able to import from NESM-migrated packages. This is because of these mutually exclusive constraints:
- Modules in a NESM package should have a
"type": "module"
property inpackage.json
, and - Modules in a RESM package must not have a
"type": "module"
property in theirpackage.json
on Node.js 12 or newer.
Published versions of esm
can only import other RESM packages, transitively.
A RESM package will also have -r esm
in any scripts, a "ava": {"require": ["esm"]}
directive, and a dependency or dev-dependency on "esm"
. These must be removed.
Endo also is an emulator of ESM but is more faithful to Node.js.
Endo does not yet support imports
in package.json
, but does support exports
.
Consequently, both Node and Endo can enforce which modules are public.
For portability with other tools (those that do not support exports
), all of a package’s public API must be exported from either its main module or a top-level module mentioned in exports
.
Consider a package that exports a platform-agnostic OCap feature and its types. It also incidentally exports an adapter/attenuator for Node.js.
Users can import:
import fs from 'node:fs';
import net from 'node:net';
import crypto from 'node:crypto';
import { makeFeature } from '@agoric/feature';
import { makeFeaturePowers } from '@agoric/feature/node-powers.js';
const powers = makeFeaturePowers({ fs, net, crypto });
/** @type {import('@agoric/feature').Delegate} */
const delegate = {};
const options = {};
const feature = makeFeature(powers, delegate, options);
The feature has this structure:
- package.json
- types.d.ts
- node-powers.js
- src/index.js
- src/types.js
- src/node-powers.js
To make the explicitly public modules addressable in Node, craft a suitable package.json
:
{
"name": "@agoric/feature",
"main": "./src/index.js",
"exports": {
".": "./src/index.js",
"./node-powers.js": "./node-powers.js",
"./package.json": "./package.json"
}
}
TypeScript does not recognize the "exports"
field in package.json
, so no special treatment is necessary for types.js
.
We prefer in most cases to have all substantial code in the src
directory, so the public ./node-powers.js
is a façade for ./src/node-pwoers.js
:
export { makeFeaturePowers } from './src/node-powers.js';
The following guidance applies to NESM packaging, and is stricter than RESM, which is a thin veneer over Node.js’s implementation of CommonJS.
- All import specifiers within the same package are merely paths to the exact file, must have an extension, and must begin with
./
or../
to distinguish them from specifiers for modules in other packages. - Any specifier that is the exact name of another package does not need an extension. The reference points, effectively, at
package.json
which must have amain
property that points to an exact file with an extension. - Any other external specifier needs to have an extension.
The motivation behind the rules is that ESM is intended to be more suitable for direct use on the web, which means that ESM does not have a “search path”, won’t issue a sequence of HTTP requests until the response is not 404. It will only try one URL for each module specifier. That disqualifies old tricks like probing the extension (is there a .node
DLL? is there a .js
file?) or probing for name
(if name is a file) or name/index
(if name is a directory).
These rules are not exhaustive. Node.js ESM introduces the properties exports
and imports
in package.json
that provide module aliases externally or internally to a package. When using exports
, another package cannot reach for an arbitrary module in another package. There must be an alias, so packages can determine their own API surface and often provide better names, like @agoric/zoe/contract-support
, which would not need an extension. The sensible convention going forward, after RESM is fully exorcised, would be that all external module specifiers are aliases and should not have extensions. We’re not there yet.
Use a platform prefix to import modules hosted by the platform:
import fs from 'node:fs';
For consistency with our OCap discipline, any module that imports a platform module, like node:fs
, must be in a file that indicates the platform dependency in its name, like feature-node.js
.
A usage pattern that emerges from this constraint is the separation of a program into layers, like:
-
feature.js
: a feature that receives all its platform capabilities by injection of platform-agnosticpowers
. At this layer, we strive to use idiomatic JavaScript features to model platform capabilities. For example, we would use async iterators for streams and use promises and delegate objects rather than the web’sEventTarget
or Node.jsEventEmitter
, -
feature-node-powers.js
orfeature-web-powers.js
: provides a function that takes platform capabilities (like Node.js module objects), then attenuates (makes them hardened OCaps, often with less authority) and adapts (makes them platform-agnostic) and produces thepowers
expected byfeature.js
, -
feature-node.js
orfeature-web.js
: if necessary, a small stub that imports and combinesfeature.js
andfeature-{platform}-powers.js
. This is useful for shell scripts.
Functions that return iterators or async iterators (i.e., generator functions) should be named like generateFoo
, and the "generate" prefix should be reserved for such functions.
See Method Naming Structure for an explanation of our distinction between makeFoo()
, createFoo()
, getFoo()
, makeFooKit()
, and provideFoo()
.
- emphasize Jessie; e.g. objects-as-closures over
class
- identify code not intended to be written in Jessie (@erights Jun 8)
- CONTRIBUTING.md : move to or cite from
- github PR template : move / copy to or cite from
- care with interleaving points: "The hazard is that, when both writing and reading a program, especially when reading other people's programs, an explicit
await
is not salient enough for people to understand that there's a turn boundary there, and that arbitrary turns interleave at that point, invalidating stateful assumptions." -- erights Apr 2020 - exceptions are not for flow control (or "errors are not normal API" or something like that)
This wiki is for developing agoric-sdk. For help using Agoric SDK, see https://docs.agoric.com/ and https://agoric-sdk.pages.dev/