You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It was deleting rows for mysterious reasons, and pretty broken, unless my intuition about (<-.) and filters is completely wrong. I thought it would translate to where (tid, index) IN (('tid1', 0), ('tid2', 1)). A workaround seems to be FilterOr a list of ==.?
I figured out how to get the SQL being used
SELECT "tid", "index", "age" FROM "person" WHERE ((("tid" IN ( ?, ?) ) and ("index" IN ( ?, ?) ))); [PersistText "tid1",PersistText "tid2",PersistInt64 0,PersistInt64 1]
so definitely not what I expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
returns
It should only return
("tid1", 0)
. Interestingly if I filter usingIt returns
[]
It was deleting rows for mysterious reasons, and pretty broken, unless my intuition about
(<-.)
and filters is completely wrong. I thought it would translate towhere (tid, index) IN (('tid1', 0), ('tid2', 1))
. A workaround seems to beFilterOr
a list of==.
?I figured out how to get the SQL being used
so definitely not what I expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: