Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The structure/category of the use case description #268

Open
chachamimm opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

The structure/category of the use case description #268

chachamimm opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@chachamimm
Copy link
Collaborator

@k-toumura wrote a comment :


How about classifying the use cases as follows and discussing them with different templates in different session or task forces?

  1. Use cases to guide what should be standardized:
    • Including specific user stories: these should allow us to understand situation where TD is used, what to describe in it, etc.
    • It enables us to identify functions that are currently lacking in TD, discovery, etc. (= gap analysis)
  2. Use cases to explain the applicability of WoT:
    • Clearly explain the benefit of using WoT to those outside the WoT WG, Chapter 4 and 5 of the current Architecture document may correspond to this. (the architecture TF might be a suitable candidate to collect and discuss them)
  3. Case studies from implementing IoT solution using WoT:
    • Introduce the experiences of using WoT in specific projects. (the marketing TF or CG might be suitable to collect and discuss them)

Please also see "Issues - 257 [Discuss] Focus on Functional Requirements"

We decided to consider this comment separately from Issues #257 at the UC Call on February 7th. So I create a new issue.

If you have opinions and comments, please write comments here.

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

As commented already in #257, I agree with this direction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants