Changes to the algorithms that will need their own PRs #613
Labels
class-3
Class-3 change
defer-future-version
Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD
spec:substantive
test:missing-coverage
test:needs implementation
test:needs tests
Some of these assume changes to the algorithms that will need their own PRs:
invalid set or list object
error. The presumed semantics are that each array value becomes its own JSON value.multiple JSON literals
because the term didn't use@set
. This is arguably a breaking change as any data that did this before would now fail (of course two JSON values on input would now be one JSON value on output). This will certainly require checks in the compaction algorithm.Originally posted by @gkellogg in #559 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: