Trillium
Non-Generic Inner Functions? #37
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Is the motivation performance in this specific context? There's probably a lot of benchmark-driven perf work to be done on trillium in the near future, and I'll definitely keep this in mind as a possible optimization. In general, my focus is initially on adding feature support so that people can express complete applications, with perf being a later concern that only matters if there's sufficient adoption |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This one motivation is reducing binary size by reducing code to that needs to be monophormized (is that the correct term?) but I agree that maybe it's too early to focus on this kind of optimizations. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This morning I've been shared this article about what says in the title and looking at the code of some methods taking for example
impl Into<Body>then doing the into and performing the rest of the function with the concrete Body like this function it seems to me that this is a prime example to apply this pattern (Having the generic parameter and an inner function working with the concrete type after the conversion).The idea behind is explained in the article but this part capture it well enough
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions