Naming convention prohibits "Coding" a research topic in more than one Category

[theareaorg]

On March 2, we discussed that many research topics we are writing up fit equally well in multiple (in some cases even three) of the seven Categories. There are also topics that could fit in multiple Groups (second order classification).

This makes it impossible for the author to code a topic using the proposed naming convention.

Here's an example that illustrates the problem: This proposed research topic is actually use case proposed by Greg Garrett (Boeing) during our meeting on March 1.
I'm not happy with the proposed code (beginning with B for Business, Integration because it involves other components of IT infrastructure).

Is this a business integration issue? It's a use case! Maybe better to make it an End user/UX topic?

This raises another related issue which I will open.

[bookwolf]

I am running into similar issues. Wondering how useful the naming convention is if we can multi-tag?? Perhaps the topic is really the title and we are tagging with the relevant groups and categories?