Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What to do when there is a lack of machine-assigned terms for a research topic? #19

Open
theareaorg opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@theareaorg
Copy link
Owner

I took action item today to include in the research topic descriptions the best low-level terms.

I started with "Cybersecurity" as a topic. I don't know if they didn't have cybersecurity or security risks back in the dark agest when the terms for this database were developed, but I just searched and came up empty with "security" and "Cybersecurity."

What am I missing?

@theareaorg
Copy link
Owner Author

Seems that I didn't have the search settings right... I've found the group of 25 terms that we assigned to the group "Security"

But I'm not confident that this issue is closed.

@wzbernstein
Copy link
Collaborator

These a human-driven judgements. If you do not believe that the existing machine-assigned terms properly reflect your concept's keyword, then place the keyword in the research concept as you wish.

@wzbernstein
Copy link
Collaborator

business
number of groups: 7
number of machine-generated terms: 158
displays
number of groups: 4
number of machine-generated terms: 124
end users and user experience
number of groups: 5
number of machine-generated terms: 89
industries
number of groups: 21
number of machine-generated terms: 943
other
number of groups: 1
number of machine-generated terms: 2
standards
number of groups: 1
number of machine-generated terms: 16
technology
number of groups: 17
number of machine-generated terms: 1080
use cases
number of groups: 6
number of machine-generated terms: 149

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants