You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the Mahoney use case: if a temperature measurement F53:deployment1:measurement1 in MOF is associated with an occurrence F53:deployment1:1902295519 and that occurrence has a precise eventDate = 2014-02-11 21:35:42.000+00:00. Do we recommend to then also repeat that eventDate as the measurementDeterminedDate of the MOF record?
@peterdesmet From the OBIS perspective there's no need to repeat the time. When we parse and index data in OBIS attributes such as time and location are inherited from parent records unless the information in the child record is more precise.
One could argue that repeating the time is useful in case someone accesses the Darwin Core Archive directly to work with the measurements, but some matching with the occurrences will need to happen anyway in order to get the coordinates (for which there are no fields in the measurements). So I would not recommend repeating time.
From the Mahoney use case: if a temperature measurement
F53:deployment1:measurement1
in MOF is associated with an occurrenceF53:deployment1:1902295519
and that occurrence has a preciseeventDate = 2014-02-11 21:35:42.000+00:00
. Do we recommend to then also repeat that eventDate as themeasurementDeterminedDate
of the MOF record?/cc @pieterprovoost
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: