We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
i notic that starkware is not using the secp256k1 curve.
however, i compared the ecdsa sign to bitcoin library secp256k1, it is much slower. libsecp256k1 only takes 85 micro per iteration.
after some digging, the current implementation does not adopt the jacobian coordinates as in libsecp256k1.
any plan to optimize that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
i notic that starkware is not using the secp256k1 curve.
however, i compared the ecdsa sign to bitcoin library secp256k1, it is much slower. libsecp256k1 only takes 85 micro per iteration.
after some digging, the current implementation does not adopt the jacobian coordinates as in libsecp256k1.
any plan to optimize that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: