Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for KR 6 R700-2 robot #192

Closed
uthiralakshmi opened this issue Jun 10, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for KR 6 R700-2 robot #192

uthiralakshmi opened this issue Jun 10, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@uthiralakshmi
Copy link

Hey hi,

I was just hoping to get details about ROS interface with KR6 R7002 robot.
I would like to know details like urdf, mesh files and how I can interface KRC5Micro Controller With ROS.

@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn changed the title Support for Kr6 R7002 robot Support for KR 6 R700-2 robot Jun 14, 2021
@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

I believe you mean the KR 6 R700-2 variant, correct?

In any case: we don't have support for that specific variant yet, so you'd have to create the required files. It's likely you could start with the files for the non--2 in kuka_kr6_support.

As to KR C5 support: I'm not sure whether there are any changes required to the RSI / EKI hw interfaces. You might need the changes proposed in #152.

@simonschmeisser
Copy link
Collaborator

You can have a look at the KR 10 R900-2, it appears to be almost the same, only link 2 and 4 being shorter. There is an open PR #198 that you can have a look at for how to reuse most of an existing robot model. You would only need to add new meshes for link 2 and 4 in the meshes folder

Re KRC5: Kuka claims there are no incompatibilities. So if the code here works on KR4 it should run on KRC5 just as well.

@longwoo
Copy link

longwoo commented Oct 20, 2021

need KR 6 R700-2 support too.

@ros-industrial ros-industrial locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2023
@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn converted this issue into discussion #244 Apr 13, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants