Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DFBUGS-317: [release-4.14] Security: fix webpack version #1627

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.14
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@alfonsomthd: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2308216: [release-4.14] Security: fix webpack version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2024

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2308216, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "ODF 4.14.12" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alfonsomthd: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@alfonsomthd alfonsomthd changed the title Bug 2308216: [release-4.14] Security: fix webpack version DFBUGS-317: [release-4.14] Security: fix webpack version Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid jira ticket of any type jira/invalid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting labels Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 12, 2024

@alfonsomthd: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-317](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-317), which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "odf-4.14.z" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308216

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting labels Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 12, 2024

@alfonsomthd: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-317](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-317), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (odf-4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: PrasadDesala.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@alfonsomthd: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-317](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-317), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (odf-4.14.z) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.14.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@GowthamShanmugam can you please add the /approve label?

@GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alfonsomthd, bipuladh, GowthamShanmugam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024

@alfonsomthd: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/images 7376dfc link unknown /test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved jira/valid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid jira ticket of any type lgtm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants