You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example, in table qwat_od.pressurezone, the name attribute is allowing only 50 characters strings.
In real world data, I frequently encountered names longer than that.
What about raising the length to some value such as 256 or 1024, which would give practitioners wider possibilities of naming?
Same thing happened in table qwat_od.distributor but here the name length is even lower (30).
Thanks a lot for your great work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I usually don't go over varchar(255), I usually prefer text() format when more than one line is implied, but I keep that format for multiline text attributes only.
These name fields are only for pressure zone names or distributor names, it would be wrong to add more than the name, better add some attributes to these classes (eg. distributor adress, email, phone number, pressure zone number, pressure zone community, ...)
30 char is very short :
Entreprise de démontage de ca 50 char is better :
Entreprise de démontage de canalisation et de récu 80 char is probably sufficient
Entreprise de démontage de canalisation et de récurage et de nettoyage et de fi 255 char is too much
Entreprise de démontage de canalisation et de récurage et de nettoyage et de fibre optique et de démontage et de génie civil dans le domaine de la construction et bla bla bli et bla bla bla société anonyme sarl corporation united infinited internati
For example, in table
qwat_od.pressurezone
, thename
attribute is allowing only50
characters strings.In real world data, I frequently encountered names longer than that.
What about raising the length to some value such as 256 or 1024, which would give practitioners wider possibilities of naming?
Same thing happened in table
qwat_od.distributor
but here thename
length is even lower (30
).Thanks a lot for your great work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: