You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both in the plain resonator spectroscopy, and in the pumped up resonator flux dependence (the version of the spectroscopy with an additional scan over the flux pulse) the phases in the transmission coefficient are affected by the cable delay, as described in #876.
In #917, the cable delay has been subtracted for the specific case of the full-fledged circle fit of the resonator spectroscopy.
The cable delay :math:`\tau` (in s) is removed from the scattering matrix element array `z` by performing
an exponential product which also depends from the `frequencies` (in Hz).
"""
returnz*np.exp(2j*np.pi*frequencies*tau)
It happened there, because that fit is the first to finally use the information on the phase for the fit, while the other fits in both protocols are just using the information in the magnitude.
Despite what is used in the fit, the phases are shown in the report, and they are largely made irrelevant by the presence of the cable delay (well, before they were even more irrelevant, since cable delay-drifted and wrapped).
So, we should ensure a consistent treatment of the phase information, even beyond the unwrapping.
Moreover, even in the s21 fit of the resonator spectroscopy the cable delay is separately evaluated, despite the "time of flight" protocol having already measured it, potentially.
So, we should make it possible to propagate the information separately measured by the time of flight (if available) to always preprocess consistently the transmission coefficient phases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Both in the plain resonator spectroscopy, and in the pumped up resonator flux dependence (the version of the spectroscopy with an additional scan over the flux pulse) the phases in the transmission coefficient are affected by the cable delay, as described in #876.
In #917, the cable delay has been subtracted for the specific case of the full-fledged circle fit of the resonator spectroscopy.
qibocal/src/qibocal/protocols/resonator_utils.py
Lines 14 to 42 in 6789ac8
It happened there, because that fit is the first to finally use the information on the phase for the fit, while the other fits in both protocols are just using the information in the magnitude.
Despite what is used in the fit, the phases are shown in the report, and they are largely made irrelevant by the presence of the cable delay (well, before they were even more irrelevant, since cable delay-drifted and wrapped).
So, we should ensure a consistent treatment of the phase information, even beyond the unwrapping.
Moreover, even in the
s21
fit of the resonator spectroscopy the cable delay is separately evaluated, despite the "time of flight" protocol having already measured it, potentially.So, we should make it possible to propagate the information separately measured by the time of flight (if available) to always preprocess consistently the transmission coefficient phases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: