-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minimal information detected when lsb-release isn't installed #152
Comments
@lenormf I assume you mean that you would expect to see "stretch/sid" in the codename? |
Sorry, I hadn't included the expected output. I think the |
Unfortunately, this seems to be something that will have to be addressed as part of #109. In debian 8, the codename appeared in parentheses and in stretch, it isn't. That's inconsistent with almost all distributions. It's also rather sad that they're not providing the version anymore.
I will start working on a distro inconsistencies framework soon, at which point i'll address this as well. |
fwiw, the latest
and these look roughly correct:
|
I'm confused. In Docker it's different? :) |
The information from when this ticket was created was when stretch was not yet a released version. Debian in this case chose to not fill out the release information. It is filed out now that it is released however \o/ |
So can this be closed? |
I believe so, yes |
Hi,
I hit this bug while using the
distro
module in a Debian Stretchdocker
container:Expected output:
The /etc/os-release:
Everything worked fine when I installed the
lsb-release
package, but I was under the impression that I wouldn't need it in the first place.HTH.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: