We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In a 2020 blog post announcing slimmer docker images, it was mentioned that users would like alpine based docker images, but the decision was made to not make them available because it would require installing glibc since alpine uses musl libc. Now that go has official support for musl libc does it make sense to revisit that decision?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for raising this, @croddin! I'll discuss more with the team.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hello!
Issue details
In a 2020 blog post announcing slimmer docker images, it was mentioned that users would like alpine based docker images, but the decision was made to not make them available because it would require installing glibc since alpine uses musl libc. Now that go has official support for musl libc does it make sense to revisit that decision?
Affected area/feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: