Undeterministic order in output

[lstrojny]

The output or encode() is non-deterministic when creating multiple metrics of the same type.

So basically:

pub fn repro() -> String {
    let mut registry = <prometheus_client::registry::Registry>::default();

    let gauge = Family::<MyLabels, Gauge<f64, AtomicU64>>::default();
    registry.register("test", "help", gauge.clone());

    gauge
        .get_or_create(&MyLabels {
            label: "one".into(),
        })
        .set(0.1);
    gauge
        .get_or_create(&MyLabels {
            label: "two".into(),
        })
        .set(0.2);

    let mut buffer = String::new();

    encode(&mut buffer, &registry).unwrap();

    buffer
}

This will sometimes return this:

HELP test help.
# TYPE test gauge
test{label="one"} 0.1
test{label="two"} 0.2
# EOF

And sometimes this:

HELP test help.
# TYPE test gauge
test{label="two"} 0.2
test{label="one"} 0.1
# EOF

I would expect the metrics to be somehow sorted deterministically.

[mxinden]

I expect this to be due to the use of HashMap in Family. It could be an option to use a different, ordered datastructure.

Related discussion prometheus/client_golang#483.

I would expect the metrics to be somehow sorted deterministically.

While I understand the value of sorted output for the sake of debugging, I am not sure it is worth than the (expected) performance hit.

[lstrojny]

That makes sense. My use case here is unit testing where I need to assert on a stable output, so I could even make a potential sorting flag dependent on cfg(test). How about adding optional sorting?

[mxinden]

How about adding optional sorting?

Have to give this more thought, though not opposed to it. Might as well always do it in debug mode.

Again, might be worth exploring replacing the HashMap and thus getting sorting for free.

[08d2]

The text encoding of metrics is defined by the spec, and the spec doesn't define any sort order, so callers can't assume any sort order.

[cratelyn]

I was looking into this for the same reasons as @lstrojny, and found this thread on the rust-lang board:

https://users.rust-lang.org/t/hashmap-vs-btreemap/13804

checked just now and BTreeMap is significantly faster than HashMap for many of
the benchmarks in our json-benchmark. (In the table lower is better.)

Benchmark	BTreeMap	HashMap
parse canada.json	10.9ms	11.9ms
stringify canada.json	11.3ms	11.6ms
parse citm_catalog.json	5.5ms	11.2ms
stringify citm_catalog.json	1.4ms	3.3ms
parse twitter.json	2.5ms	2.9ms
stringify twitter.json	0.6ms	0.9ms

It seems like in addition to getting sorting for free, we may be likely to actually see a performance improvement for many cases, as the serde-json maintainer notes there.

As @lstrojny notes above, stable output is often very helpful for ensuring deterministic results in unit tests. If the existing hash map behavior needed to be preserved, a similar approach that internally abstracts over the two kinds of maps could offer the benefits of both.

The issue linked above prometheus/client_golang#483 also seems to indicate that the Go client also sorts metrics, with the open question there being how to optionally disable sorting for families with an especially large exposition.

I'm sympathetic to @08d2's point above, but I see only upside, without any real downside. If we stand to (a) improve performance, (b) improve testing ergonomics, and (c) mirror the behavior of other languages' client libraries by moving to a BTreeMap, does #128 seem like a reasonable change to you all?