Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the Joomla templates #223

Open
Llewellynvdm opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Improve the Joomla templates #223

Llewellynvdm opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Llewellynvdm
Copy link

I wanted to bring your attention to two pull requests I submitted almost five months ago:

These PRs are aimed at improving the Joomla container deployment for Portainer. Here’s a quick rundown of what they do:

  1. PR #196: This PR updates the Joomla template with better defaults and some configuration tweaks to make deployments smoother and more reliable.

  2. PR #194: This one adds some new features to the Joomla container setup, making it easier and more efficient to use.

Why These Changes Matter:

  • Better Defaults: The new defaults help avoid common pitfalls and make the deployment process more user-friendly.
  • New Features: Added features enhance functionality and improve the overall experience for Joomla users on Portainer.
  • Improved Reliability: These updates aim to make Joomla deployments more stable and predictable.

I believe these changes will be really beneficial for Joomla users on the Portainer platform. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at these PRs when you get a chance. If there’s anything more you need from me or any changes you’d like to see, just let me know, and I’ll be happy to address them.

Thanks a lot for your time and help!

@Llewellynvdm
Copy link
Author

You can test these changes :
image

Using this url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/octoleo/portainer-templates/octoleo/templates-2.0.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant