Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce a centralized GHA check/gate job #4482

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

webknjaz
Copy link

@webknjaz webknjaz commented Nov 30, 2022

This patch is intended to lower the maintenance burden of having to manually go through each matrix subjob name in the branch protection repository settings. It allows to only include the check job in the branch protection and it will robustly determine if the dependencies have succeeded or not.

It is currently mostly serves the Python ecosystem in projects like aiohttp, cryptography, open edX, pip etc. But I've also seen other communities picking it up lately, like the AWS Rust SDK and even the engine powering https://dev.to, to my surprise. Strictly speaking, it is agnostic.

Ref: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/alls-green#why

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 30, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

This patch is intended to lower the maintenance burden of having to
manually go through each matrix subjob name in the branch protection
repository settings. It allows to only include the check job in the
branch protection and it will robustly determine if the dependencies
have succeeded or not.

It is currently mostly serves the Python ecosystem in projects like
aiohttp, cryptography, open edX, pip etc. But I've also seen other
communities picking it up lately, like the AWS Rust SDK and even the
engine powering https://dev.to, to my surprise. Strictly speaking, it
is agnostic.

Ref: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/alls-green#why
@webknjaz webknjaz force-pushed the maintenance/gha-check branch from d514d53 to 4b47627 Compare November 30, 2022 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants