Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fatxpool: cross check (and improve) support for priority transactions #5809

Open
Tracked by #5472
michalkucharczyk opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #6647
Open
Tracked by #5472

fatxpool: cross check (and improve) support for priority transactions #5809

michalkucharczyk opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #6647
Assignees
@michalkucharczyk
Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.

Comments

@michalkucharczyk
Copy link
Contributor

Make sure that priority transactions are replacing lower prio transaction that are already in the pool.
These may require some support in ttxt.
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2024
Open
@michalkucharczyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related comment:
#4639 (comment)

@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2024
Merged
@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk added the T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. label Sep 23, 2024
This was referenced Nov 26, 2024
Open
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk

Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fatxpool: proper handling of priorities when mempool is full paritytech/polkadot-sdk
1 participant
@michalkucharczyk