-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-29437: install the smaller openshift-kubelet package #1449
OCPBUGS-29437: install the smaller openshift-kubelet package #1449
Conversation
The packaging has recently been refactored to offer a kubelet only package, which is all that RHCOS should require. This removes extraneous server binaries kube-apiserver, kube-controller-manager, and kube-scheduler
@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29437, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/test ? |
@sdodson: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test all |
/approve CI should be fixed by #1448. |
/test ci/prow/rhcos-9-build-test-metal |
@sdodson: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Looks like the rhcos-9 metal wasn't retesting on top of #1448. /retest |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jlebon, sdodson, travier The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@sdodson: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@sdodson: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29437: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29437 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
The packaging has recently been refactored to offer a kubelet only package, which is all that RHCOS should require. This removes extraneous server binaries kube-apiserver, kube-controller-manager, and kube-scheduler