You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Referring to the reference data for Content Categories (Section 6.1), the tier-1 IAB values have been changed from the OpenRTB Mobile specification unnecessarily. The 2.0 draft adds tier-2 codes which is great. However, in the OpenRTB Mobile specification, IAB-24 was “Uncategorized” which is noted in the IAB reference in sequence as the 24th tier-1 category and it has IAB-25 and IAB-26 as “Non-Standard Content” and “Illegal Content”, respectively. The 2.0 draft not only eliminates “Uncategorized”, but renumbers the latter two as IAB-24 and IAB-25.
The tier-2 codes under IAB-1 through IAB-23 are fine, but the aforementioned OpenRTB Mobile definitions of IAB-24, IAB-25, and IAB-26 should be restored to avoid a needless point of backward incompatibility.
Original author: [email protected] (July 22, 2011 21:30:35)
Referring to the reference data for Content Categories (Section 6.1), the tier-1 IAB values have been changed from the OpenRTB Mobile specification unnecessarily. The 2.0 draft adds tier-2 codes which is great. However, in the OpenRTB Mobile specification, IAB-24 was “Uncategorized” which is noted in the IAB reference in sequence as the 24th tier-1 category and it has IAB-25 and IAB-26 as “Non-Standard Content” and “Illegal Content”, respectively. The 2.0 draft not only eliminates “Uncategorized”, but renumbers the latter two as IAB-24 and IAB-25.
The tier-2 codes under IAB-1 through IAB-23 are fine, but the aforementioned OpenRTB Mobile definitions of IAB-24, IAB-25, and IAB-26 should be restored to avoid a needless point of backward incompatibility.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/openrtb/issues/detail?id=34
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: